Peer Review
In Part B of Assessment 3, your role is switched to a policy maker responsible for the development of policies pertaining to information systems. You will be given a policy pitch (viz. a video) and you are required to write a 500-word review for that pitch. In your review, you should provide constructive feedback for the following aspects of the pitch:
• the extent to which the pitch demonstrated a solid understanding of the basic concepts of information systems and its role in an organisation;
• the extent to which the pitch has given due deliberation on the relevant political, economic, sociocultural and technological factors; • the extent to which the pitch is aligned with ethical, professional standard and complied with legal requirement;
• the structure of the video;
• the effectiveness of communication;
• any other aspects of the pitch that have room for improvement;
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Peer Review
Part B You will be required to review the Part A video presentation of another student. Please pair with another student and share the link to view the relevant presentation. You are not required to meet, hold discussions with or provide any feedback to the other student. Your review is submitted to the facilitator only.
This review will be a written response of no more than 1250 words and whilst you will have limited information and understanding of the other student’s context and challenges, you are to provide feedback in the following:
ï‚· Consideration of relevant theory and concepts and their application to the issues raised.
ï‚· Integration of concepts and appreciation of their implications
ï‚· Communication style and effectiveness
ï‚· Strengths of the presentation
ï‚· Areas for development or further consideration Your response should take into consideration the key principles discussed in relation to communication and performance management. A constructive review will require you to have a solid understanding of all topics covered in this subject.
Your review may take a variety of forms but must be within the word limit and include:
ï‚· Cover page
ï‚· A short introduction
ï‚· A review of the presentation including the points mentioned above
ï‚· A short conclusion
ï‚· Reference list
Your review will be assessed against the learning rubric below taking into consideration the above requirements.
(((( i will Email the presntation )))
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"




Peer Review
Peer Feedback:
- Respond to the introduction. We have discussed and applied many possibilities for beginning a piece of writing – evaluate the effectiveness of the one the author has chosen.
- Underline the topic sentence in each paragraph. Are the paragraphs connected and do they evolve the author’s argument?
- Evaluate the integration of textual evidence. Is each source fully introduced and analyzed? Are the sources cited correctly in the text?
- Respond to the organization of the essay (either in the text or at the end, depending on which will be most helpful to the writer).
- Does the author have a clearly stated position in relation to the social issue being conveyed? (ie. Does the essay do more than provide an overview of the situation?)
- Locate and respond to the alternative perspective included. Is it fully explained and evaluated in relation to the primary perspective and position being conveyed?
- Respond to the conclusion. Does the essay end in a way that is satisfying? For example, does it respond to the content in the essay or offer a plan for action?
- Check the works cited page for correctness.
- Comment on the clarity of the sentences. Locate two sentences that could be made more clear and give specific suggestions.
- Respond to the concern the writer expressed (#1 above)
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"



